A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery

27Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Urinary catheterisation following vaginal prolapse surgery causes inconvenience for patients, risk of urinary tract infections and potentially longer hospitalisation. Possibly, practice variation exists concerning diagnosis and management of abnormal postvoid residual (PVR) volume implying suboptimal treatment for certain subgroups. Methods: Nationwide questionnaire-based survey. Results: Post-operatively, 77% performed transurethral indwelling catheterisation, 12% suprapubic catheterisation and 11% intermittent catheterisation. Catheterisation was applied 3 days (1-7 days) following anterior repair and 1 day (1-3 days) following all other procedures. The median cut-off point for abnormal PVR was 150 mL (range 50-250 mL). Treatment of abnormal PVR consisted mostly of prolonging transurethral indwelling catheterisation for 2 days (range 1-5 days; 57%), 29% by intermittent and 12% by suprapubic catheterisation. Antibiotics were administered by 21% either routinely or based on symptoms only. Conclusions: Due to insufficient evidence and suboptimal implementation of available evidence, practice variation in catheterisation regimens is high. © The Author(s) 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hakvoort, R. A., Burger, M. P., Emanuel, M. H., & Roovers, J. P. (2009). A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. International Urogynecology Journal, 20(7), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0847-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free