Rapid immunoaffinity-based method for determination of zearalenone in corn by fluorometry and liquid chromatography

33Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An immunoaffinity-based method was developed to determine zearalenone in corn. Corn samples were extracted in acetonitrile-water (90 + 10, v/v), applied to an immunoaffinity column, and eluted with methanol. The isolated toxin was quantitated either by reaction with aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AICl3-6H2O) prior to measurement with a fluorometer or injection into a liquid chromatographic (LC) system with a fluorescence detector. Performance was evaluated in terms of antibody specificity, limit of detection, percentage recovery, precision, column capacity, assay linearity, and comparison with AOAC Official Method 985.18. With the immunoaffinity column cleanup procedure, only zearalenone and its metabolites were recognized by the antibody (≥75% recovery). Limits of detection were 0.10 μ/g for the fluorometer and 0.10 or 0.0025 μ/g (sensitive method) for the LC method. Percentage recovery averaged 105% (fluorometer) and 93% (LC method), with average relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 15.7 and 9.3%. Naturally contaminated samples gave comparable RSDs of 8.3 and 9.9% for the fluorometer and LC methods, respectively. Column capacity was 4.0 μg with 89% recovery. Assay linearity was comparable for both methods (r2 = 0.998). Optimum assay ranges were 0.10-5.0 μ/g for the fluorometer and 0.10-50 or 0.0025-5.0 μ/g (sensitive method) for the LC method. Comparative analysis of 17 naturally contaminated corn samples using ZearalaTest LC and the official AOAC LC method for detection of zearalenone showed that ZearalaTest is statistically comparable to the AOAC Official Method 985.18 (r2 = 0.747).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kruger, S. C., Kohn, B., Ramsey, C. S., & Prioli, R. (1999). Rapid immunoaffinity-based method for determination of zearalenone in corn by fluorometry and liquid chromatography. Journal of AOAC International, 82(6), 1364–1368. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/82.6.1364

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free