Comparison of direct statistical and indirect statistical-deterministic frameworks in downscaling river low-flow indices

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This work explores the ability of two methodologies in downscaling hydrological indices characterizing the low flow regime of three salmon rivers in Eastern Canada: Moisie, Romaine and Ouelle. The selected indices describe four aspects of the low flow regime of these rivers: amplitude, frequency, variability and timing. The first methodology (direct downscaling) ascertains a direct link between large-scale atmospheric variables (the predictors) and low flow indices (the predictands). The second (indirect downscaling) involves downscaling precipitation and air temperature (local climate variables) that are introduced into a hydrological model to simulate flows. Synthetic flow time series are subsequently used to calculate the low flow indices. The statistical models used for downscaling low flow hydrological indices and local climate variables are: Sparse Bayesian Learning and Multiple Linear Regression. The results showed that direct downscaling using Sparse Bayesian Learning surpassed the other approaches with respect to goodness of fit and generalization ability. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis; Associate editor K. Hamed

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joshi, D., St-Hilaire, A., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Daigle, A., & Thiemonge, N. (2016). Comparison of direct statistical and indirect statistical-deterministic frameworks in downscaling river low-flow indices. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61(11), 1996–2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.966719

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free