The Second-Century Šīʿite Ġulāt: Were They Really Gnostic?

  • Bayhom-Daou T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper questions the suggestion of our sources that gnostic currents had already appeared among Šīʿites by the early second/eighth century. It contends that gnosticism did not surface in Šīʿism until the third/ninth century and that our information on its existence among second-century Šīʿites is the result of retrospective ascription to groups and individuals who, on account of their (real or alleged) messianic beliefs, had already been identified by moderate Imāmīs as ġulāt. That information would have served to distance Imāmism and its imāms from gnostic teachings by associating those teachings with repudiated figures from the past. The paper examines evidence showing that in his work on firaq Hišām b. al-Ḥakam (d. 179/795) was not aware of the existence of gnostic ideas in Šīʿism. Other examined evidence also shows that references to gnostic ġuluww are conspicuous by their absence from sources on Šīʿism that are datable to before the third/ ninth century.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bayhom-Daou, T. (1970). The Second-Century Šīʿite Ġulāt: Were They Really Gnostic? Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 13–61. https://doi.org/10.5617/jais.4571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free