A systematic review of the sex and gender reporting in covid-19 clinical trials

44Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sex and gender have implications for COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and adverse effects from the vaccine. As vaccination is one of the key responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is vital that sex and gender differences be acknowledged, measured, and analysed in clinical research. Here, we systematically review published COVID-19 vaccine trials, both interventional and observational, to assess the quality of reporting of sex and gender. Of the 75 clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines included in this review, only 24% presented their main outcome data disaggregated by sex, and only 13% included any discussion of the implications of their study for women and men. Considering the sex differences in adverse events after vaccination, and the gendered aspects of vaccine hesitancy, these oversights in clinical research on vaccines have implications for recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and for wider public health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heidari, S., Palmer-Ross, A., & Goodman, T. (2021, November 1). A systematic review of the sex and gender reporting in covid-19 clinical trials. Vaccines. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free