Electroacupuncture with usual care for patients with non-acute pain after back surgery: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Electroacupuncture (EA) is used to treat pain after back surgery. Although this treatment is covered by national health insurance in Korea, evidence supporting its cost-effectiveness and contribution to the sustainability of the national health care system has yet to be published. Therefore, an economic evaluation, alongside a clinical trial, was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of EA and usual care (UC) versus UC alone to treat non-acute low back pain (LBP). In total, 108 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to treatment groups; 106 were included in the final cost utility analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EA plus UC was estimated as 7,048,602 Korean Rate Won (KRW) per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the societal perspective (SP). If the national threshold was KRW 30 million per QALY, the cost-effectiveness probability of EA plus UC was an estimated 85.9%; and, if the national threshold was over KRW 42,496,372 per QALY, the cost-effectiveness probability would be over 95% percent statistical significance. Based on these results, EA plus UC combination therapy for patients with non-acute LBP may be cost-effective from a societal perspective in Korea.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, N. K., Shin, K. M., Seo, E. S., Park, M., & Lee, H. Y. (2020). Electroacupuncture with usual care for patients with non-acute pain after back surgery: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free