Initial potency of lansoprazole and omeprazole tablets on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion - A placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers

14Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: The new tablet formulation of omeprazole (Losec MUPS), is thought to have a stronger acid inhibition than the previously marketed capsules. Methods: The effects of the proton pump inhibitors lansoprazole and omeprazole tablets on pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion were compared in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy male volunteers (n = 12). The study was placebo-controlled, crossover matched and double-blind for lansoprazole (Agopton) and placebo, and single-blind for omeprazole tablets, Gastric acid response to sub-maximal pentagastrin-stimulation (0.6 μg · h/kg b.w.) was determined from 12.5 to 14.5 h after the first and second dose of the test drugs. Results: Lansoprazole 15 mg and 30 mg as well as omeprazole 20 mg tablets caused a marked decrease in gastric acid secretion, showing equipotency for 15 mg lansoprazole and 20 mg omeprazole tablets. Their efficacy, however, was lower than 30 mg lansoprazole. In addition, the inter-individual variation after omeprazole tablets was higher than following lansoprazole. Neither 7.5 mg lansoprazole nor 10 mg omeprazole tablets were clearly different from placebo on the first 2 days. The drugs were well-tolerated. No clinically relevant influence was found on either laboratory screen or cardiovascular parameters. Conclusion: Lansoprazole 15-30 mg shows a stronger acid inhibition and a lower inter-individual variability than the new omeprazole 20 mg tablets on days 1 and 2 of dosing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Müller, Göksu, Fuchs, Schlüter, & Simon. (2000). Initial potency of lansoprazole and omeprazole tablets on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion - A placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 14(9), 1225–1229. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00823.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free