Diffusion MRI fiber diameter for muscle denervation assessment

23Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: To develop and evaluate a diffusion MRI-based apparent muscle fiber diameter (AFD) method in patients with muscle denervation. It was hypothesized that AFD differences between denervated, non-denervated and control muscles would be greater than those from standard diffusion metrics. Methods: A spin-echo diffusion acquisition with multi-b-valued diffusion sampling was used. An orientation-invariant dictionary approach utilized a cylinder-based forward model and multi-compartment model for obtaining restricted and free fractions. Simulations were performed to determine precision, bias, and optimize dictionary parameters. In all, 18 exams of patients with muscle denervation and 8 exams of healthy subjects were performed at 3T. Six regions of interests (ROIs) within separate shoulder muscles were selected, yielding three groups consisting 47 control (healthy), 36 non-denervated (patients), and 68 denervated (patients) muscle ROIs. Two-sample t-tests (α=0.05) between groups were performed with Holm- Bonferroni correction. T2- and fat fraction (FF)-mapping were acquired for comparison. Results: Mean AFD was 89.7±13.6 μm in control, 71.6±15.3 μm in non-denervated, and 60.7±15.9 μm in denervated muscles and were significantly different (P<0.001) in paired comparisons and in 10/12 individual muscle region comparisons. Correlation between AFD and FF (-0.331, P<0.001) was low, but correlation between FA and FF was negligible (0.197, P=0.016). Correlation was low between AFD and T2 (-0.395, P<0.001) and between FA and T2 (0.359, P<0.001). Conclusions: Diffusion MRI-based AFD complements T2- and FF-mapping techniques to non-invasively assess muscle denervation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, E. T., Zochowski, K. C., & Sneag, D. B. (2022). Diffusion MRI fiber diameter for muscle denervation assessment. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 12(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-313

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free