Retrospective analysis of type of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

56Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is now considered a relatively safe procedure, owing to refined surgical techniques and management. Methods: Three hundred different types of hepatic resection performed in one hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The operative morbidity and mortality rates and long-term survival were assessed. Results: Tumours were extirpated by lobectomy or extended lobectomy in 48 patients, by segmentectomy in 53, by subsegmentectomy in 94 and by partial resection in 105. The overall hospital mortality rate was 4 per cent (13 of 300). No operative death occurred after lobectomy or extended lobectomy. Segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy were associated with high postoperative complication and hospital mortality rates. There was a significant difference in survival rate between patients with and without a cancer-free surgical margin of more than 1.0 cm. The overall 5- and 9-year survival rates were 51 and 9 per cent respectively. Rates were 56 and 24 per cent for lobectomy or extended lobectomy. Conclusion: For tumours of 2.1 cm or more in size lobectomy appears to carry the least risk of postoperative complications and death in hospital and best achieves a cancer-free surgical margin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takano, S., Oishi, H., Kono, S., Kawakami, S., Nakamura, M., Kubota, N., & Iwai, S. (2000). Retrospective analysis of type of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. British Journal of Surgery, 87(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01308.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free