Assessment of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging as quantitative biomarkers for differentiating benign from malignant solid hepatic lesions

14Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To quantitatively compare the monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models in differentiating benign from malignant solid hepatic lesions. The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the informed consent requirement. A total of 188 patients with 288 hepatic lesions included 202 malignant lesions and 86 benign lesions were assessed (confirmed by pathology or clinical follow-up for 6 months). All patients underwent hepatic 3.0-T MRI, including multi-b DWI that used 12 b values. The ADC, Dp, Dt, perfusion fraction (fp), α, and DDC values for normal liver, benign liver lesions, and malignant liver lesions were calculated. Independent sample t tests were used for comparisons. The diagnostic performance of the parameters was evaluated using ROC analysis. The AUC value for each model was also calculated. The value of Dp was significantly lower in benign lesions than in normal hepatic parenchyma while others were significantly higher (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, Y., Tang, H., Li, H., Li, A., Li, J., Hu, D., … Kamel, I. R. (2018). Assessment of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging as quantitative biomarkers for differentiating benign from malignant solid hepatic lesions. Cancer Medicine, 7(7), 3501–3509. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free