Informing patients of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy: Nephrologists' ethical obligation

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As consultants, nephrologists are often in a position to observe and diagnose nonrenal illnesses as well as identify potential complications of previously prescribed therapies. The decision to discuss these types of issues with patients can be complicated by the fear of offending the patient's primary care physician. When such situations pose potential harm to patients, they become ethical issues and the nephrologist's responsibility to inform patients of potentially harmful exposure is clear. Given recent research findings, the use of hormone replacement therapy by many of the patients referred to nephrologists should be reviewed and discussed with the patient and the referring physician. All potential benefits and harms should be clearly stated. © 2004 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noland, L. R. (2004). Informing patients of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy: Nephrologists’ ethical obligation. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 11(4), 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2004.07.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free