Point of care assessment of cardiac troponin T level in CKD patients with chest symptom

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We challenged to identify the cutoff value of cTnT in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients by point of care assessment way. A single center, prospective cross-sectional study was planned and performed. 201 consecutive patients who were visited emergency room for chest symptoms were enrolled in this study. All patients were performed routine practice for differential diagnosis of chest symptom by cardiologist. Simultaneously, semiquantitative measurement of cTnT was performed using same blood sampling on the blind condition to cardiologists for this study. Study patients were divided into four groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CKD1-2, CKD3, CKD4-5, and CKD5D. Usefulness of semiquantitative measurement for diagnosing ACEs was investigated in each group. 77 (38%) of total patient was diagnosed as acute coronary events (ACEs). About 50% of patients were showing cTnT level less than 0.03ng/mL. The cTnT level over 0.1ng/mL was found in 30% of total subjects. Mean quantitative value of cTnT was 0.29±0.57ng/mL in total subjects. Estimated cutoff value in CKD3 patients was 0.088ng/mL with a sensitivity of 59.3% and specificity of 80.0%. Interestingly, the cutoff values of CKD1-2, CKD4-5, and CKD5D were 0.047, 0.18, and 0.27 respectively, which are half, two times, and three times of CKD3 cutoff value 0.088. The specificities of four cutoff values in each CKD group were showing over 80%, which is higher than sensitivity, respectively. In CKD patients, semiquantitative, point of care assessment of cTnT could be a useful tool for screening for ACEs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iwasaki, M., Yamazaki, K., Ikeda, N., Tanaka, Y., Hayashi, T., Kubo, S., … Joki, N. (2017). Point of care assessment of cardiac troponin T level in CKD patients with chest symptom. Renal Failure, 39(1), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2016.1256311

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free