The effect of altitude on parasite density case definitions for malaria in northeastern Tanzania

26Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Malaria clinical trials need precise endpoints to measure efficacy. In endemic areas where asymptomatic parasitaemia is common, 'fever plus parasitaemia' may not differentiate between malaria cases and non-cases. Case definitions based on parasite cut-off densities may be more appropriate but may vary with age and transmission intensity. This study examines appropriate case definitions from parasitological surveys conducted over a broad range of transmission intensities, using altitude as a proxy for transmission intensity. METHODS: Cross-sectional data collected from 24 villages at different altitudes in an endemic area of northeastern Tanzania were used to calculate malaria-attributable fractions using a modified Poisson regression method. We modelled fever as a function of parasite density and determined the optimum cutoff densities of parasites to cause fever using sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: The optimum cut-off density varied by altitude in children aged under 5 years: a case definition of 4000 parasites per μl at altitudes <600 m (high transmission intensity) was most appropriate, compared with 1000 parasites per μl at altitudes >600 m (low transmission intensity). In children aged over 5 years and adults, there was little variation by altitude and a case definition of any parasites plus fever was the most appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Locally appropriate case definitions of malaria should be used for research purposes. In our setting, these varied independently with age and transmission intensity. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandler, C. I. R., Drakeley, C. J., Reyburn, H., & Carneiro, I. (2006). The effect of altitude on parasite density case definitions for malaria in northeastern Tanzania. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 11(8), 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01672.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free