Disparities in the receipt of fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy among Filipino American immigrants

29Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This report examines disparities associated with the type ofcolorectal screening test, fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy, within a particular racial/ethnic group, Filipino American immigrants. Methods: Between July 2005 and October 2006, Filipino Americans aged 50 to 75 years from 31 community organizations in Los Angeles completed a 15-minute survey in English (65%) or Filipino (35%). Results: Of the 487 respondents included in this analysis, 257 (53%) had never received any type of colorectal cancer screening. Among the 230 subjects who had ever received a routine screening test, 78 had fecal occult blood test only (16% of the total sample), and 152 had endoscopy with or without fecal occult blood test (31% of the total sample). After controlling for access to care and key demographic variables in a multivariate analysis, only two characteristics distinguished between respondents who had fecal occult blood test only versus those who had endoscopy: acculturation, assessed by percent lifetime in the United States and language of interview, and income. Conclusions: Our data suggest a two-tier system, fecal occult blood test for less acculturated Filipino Americans with lower income versus endoscopy for Filipino immigrants with higher levels ofacculturation and income. The disparity persists after adjusting for access to care. Instead oftreating minority groups as monolithic, differences within groups need to be examined so that interventions can be appropriately targeted. Copyright © 2008 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maxwell, A. E., Danao, L. L., Crespi, C. M., Antonio, C., Garcia, G. M., & Bastani, R. (2008). Disparities in the receipt of fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy among Filipino American immigrants. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 17(8), 1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2800

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free