Should political science be more relevant? An empirical and critical analysis of the discipline

29Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper arises from the empirical evidence about trends, issues and perspectives in political science to be found in the International Political Science Association's (IPSA) Research Committee 33 book series entitled - The World of Political Science: Development of the Discipline and the papers presented at the 2008 Montreal Conference of the IPSA on New Theoretical and Regional Perspectives on International Political Science. One of the issues raised by this analysis of the discipline's strengths and weaknesses is the question of whether political science is relevant to the outside world, and if not why not? It is evident to the naked eye that in comparison with, say, economists (President Obama has three advisory councils), political science is of relatively little interest to policymakers, the media and the public. We have to ask whether political science is out of step with the world, and if so what might be done about it? © 2011 European Consortium for Political Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trent, J. E. (2011, June). Should political science be more relevant? An empirical and critical analysis of the discipline. European Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.65

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free