Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While concerns remain regarding Electronic Medical Records (EMR) use impeding doctor–patient communication, resident and faculty patient perspectives post-widespread EMR adoption remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe patient perspectives of outpatient resident and faculty EMR use and identify positive and negative EMR use examples to promote optimal utilization. DESIGN: This was a prospective mixed-methods study. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine faculty and resident patients at the University of Chicago’s primary care clinic participated in the study. APPROACH: In 2013, one year after EMR implementation, telephone interviews were conducted with patients using open-ended and Likert style questions to elicit positive and negative perceptions of EMR use by physicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively to develop a coding classification. Satisfaction with physician EMR use was examined using bivariate statistics. RESULTS: In total, 108 interviews were completed and analyzed. Two major themes were noted: (1) Clinical Functions of EMR and (2) Communication Functions of EMR; as well as six subthemes: (1a) Clinical Care (i.e., clinical efficiency), (1b) Documentation (i.e., proper record keeping and access), (1c) Information Access, (1d) Educational Resource, (2a) Patient Engagement and (2b) Physical Focus (i.e., body positioning). Overall, 85 % (979/1154) of patient perceptions of EMR use were positive, with the majority within the “Clinical Care” subtheme (n = 218). Of negative perceptions, 66 % (115/175) related to the “Communication Functions” theme, and the majority of those related to the “Physical Focus” subtheme (n = 71). The majority of patients (90 %, 95/106) were satisfied with physician EMR use: 59 % (63/107) reported the computer had a positive effect on their relationship and only 7 % (8/108) reported the EMR made it harder to talk with their doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns regarding EMRs impeding doctor–patient communication, patients reported largely positive perceptions of the EMR with many patients reporting high levels of satisfaction. Future work should focus on improving doctors “physical focus” when using the EMR to redirect towards the patient.