Abstract
This article discusses the dynamics of the treatment-enhancement distinction, and argues that practices that could be labelled ‘enhancement’ can also be understood in terms of medicalisation and ‘disease mongering’. The argument is supported by results from a qualitative empirical study into the experiences and opinions of adults diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Patients are ambivalent about how to understand ADHD: as a disease, a disorder or a normal variation.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
SCHERMER, M. (2007). The Dynamics of the Treatment-enhancement Distinction: ADHD as a Case Study. Philosophica, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82183
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.