Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin® 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. Methods: This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. Results: The arithmetic mean Cmax was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC0−t was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0−t fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00–125.00%, as their values were 91.67–112.47% for ln(Cmax) and 92.34–103.47% for ln(AUC0−t). Conclusion: Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin® 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ascaso-del-Rio, A., Camargo-Mamani, P., Gilaberte, I., Díez-Hochleitner, M., Laredo-Velasco, L., Iglesias-Hernangómez, T., … Portolés-Pérez, A. (2025). Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial. Pharmaceuticals, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free