Comparison of e test and disc diffusion methods for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; experience of a routine lab

6Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Testing for antifungal susceptibility to newly introduced drugs is standardized through the clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI) broth micro-dilution method for testing of molds (M38-A2), yet is difficult to use routinely. Objectives: To compare two agar-based diffusion methods on two types of media for fungal drug sensitivity testing. Materials and Methods: The E-test method and the disc diffusion method were used on non-supplemented Muller Hinton agar (MHA) and RPMI for evaluating the in-vitro susceptibility of 48 clinical isolates of filamentous fungi to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin. Results: Categorical agreement between E-test and disc diffusion method for itraconazole and voriconazole was 100%, yet for amphotericin B on MHA agar was 66.67%, and on RPMI, it was 47.92%. The correlation coefficient (R) between the inhibition zone diameters when using MHA and RPMI for itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin was +0.745, +0.901 +0.649, and +0.409, respectively. Conclusions: Routine antifungal susceptibility testing using disk diffusion can be implemented in routine microbiology work up in limited resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hassan, R. M., Ismail, D. K., & Elkholy, Y. S. (2018). Comparison of e test and disc diffusion methods for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; experience of a routine lab. Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.57889

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free