The Role of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness in Predicting Cesarean Scar Defects: Two-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Vs. Intraoperative Findings

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background & Objective: To evaluate the risk of uterine rupture during pregnancy, researchers use two-dimensional (2D) transvaginal ultrasound to assess lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in the third trimester of pregnancy. This study aimed to compare the thickness of the LUS provided in a 2D transvaginal ultrasound with the findings during a cesarean section (C/S) of pregnant women with a history of previous C/S. Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 40 pregnant women referred to Izadi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital in Qom. All the women underwent transvaginal ultrasound followed by C/S within a maximum of one week later. Also, an expert gynecologist classified LUS thickness into four grades in the operation room. Results: The mean age of women was 31.58 ± 4.56 years, and the mean thickness of the LUS was 2.17 ± 0.51 cm. Moreover, 57.5% of the women have graded I of LUS based on intraoperative findings. Results indicated that the mean thickness of the LUS measured by ultrasound significantly differed between the three grades detected by the gynecologist (P=0.04). However, there were no significant differences between maternal age, gestational age, parity, and time of last C/S among women with different LUS grades (P˃0.05). Transvaginal ultrasound could be helpful in evaluating the risk of scar dehiscence and uterine rupture among women with LUS grades I and II with a history of previous C/S. Conclusion: Transvaginal Ultrasonography, Lower Uterine Segment Thickness, Cesarean Section.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amoozegar, H., Rahmati, N., Nasiri, Z., Shah-Hamzehi, S., Moradi, A., Vahedian, M., & Noori, E. (2024). The Role of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness in Predicting Cesarean Scar Defects: Two-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Vs. Intraoperative Findings. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research, 9(5), 537–541. https://doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.9.5.537

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free