What Should Students Pay for University Course Readings? An Empirical, Economic, and Legal Analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The digital transformation of knowledge dissemination and academic publishing have sparked copyright disputes in the educational sector related to the scope of fair dealing. This study contributes (a) an empirical basis for such discussions by analyzing 3,391 course syllabuses (2015–2020) from 34 Canadian universities, and (b) a potential resolution to the disputes to which this analysis is applied. Among the reading types, 26.6% of the syllabuses had readings from academic sources, while 8.3% of the syllabuses had media articles and trade book chapters (with some overlap). The syllabus data are used to calculate a per-page royalty charge, which is used to demonstrate a proposed three-step syllabus rule to avoid double-charging students for academic materials (amounting to 90.1% of readings by pages), while fairly compensating professional authors and their publishers (9.9% of readings by pages). The three-step syllabus rule provides a sound rationale for charging each student $1.40 per year to cover royalty charges for readings assigned in Canadian university courses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Willinsky, J., & Baron, C. (2021). What Should Students Pay for University Course Readings? An Empirical, Economic, and Legal Analysis. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 51(4), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.47678/CJHE.V51I4.189159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free