Abstract
In theory, residential mobility is a response to environmental stress only if households do not reduce dissatisfaction through other alternatives, such as housing improvements or repairs. Despite the attention given to stress-reducing alternatives, however, no attempt has been made to test empirically the residential satisfaction model with adjustments. Using data from the Annual Housing Survey: 1978-1981, I model three stages in the mobility process and investigate potential sources of specification error in previous tests. Blocks of family cycle, background/action state, and location/housing variables are shown to affect adjusting significantly. Residential satisfaction strongly affectsmobility preferences; and all theoretically relevant blocks of explanatory variables predict mobility. Alternatives to mobility should be included in the residential satisfaction model. © 1990 Population Association of America.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Deane, G. D. (1990). Mobility and adjustments: Paths to the resolution of residential stress. Demography, 27(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061553
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.