The effect of local Universe constraints on halo abundance and clustering

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cosmological N-body simulations of the dark matter component of the universe typically use initial conditions with a fixed power spectrum and random phases of the density field, leading to structure consistent with the local distribution of galaxies only in a statistical sense. It is, however, possible to infer the initial phases which lead to the configuration of galaxies and clusters that we see around us. We analyse the CSiBORG suite of 101 simulations, formed by constraining the density field within 155 Mpc h-1 with dark matter particle mass 4.38 × 109 M·, to quantify the degree to which constraints imposed on 2.65 Mpc h-1 scales reduce variance in the halo mass function and halo-halo cross-correlation function on a range of scales. This is achieved by contrasting CSiBORG with a subset of the unconstrained Quijote simulations and expectations for the ΛCDM average. Using the FOF, PHEW, and HOP halofinders, we show that the CSiBORG suite beats cosmic variance at large mass scales (∼1014 M· h-1), which are most strongly constrained by the initial conditions, and exhibits a significant halo-halo cross-correlation out to ∼30 Mpc h-1. Moreover, the effect of the constraints percolates down to lower mass objects and to scales below those on which they are imposed. Finally, we develop an algorithm to 'twin' haloes between realizations and show that approximately 50 per cent of haloes with mass greater than 1015 M· h-1 can be identified in all realizations of the CSiBORG suite. We make the CSiBORG halo catalogues publicly available for future applications requiring knowledge of the local halo field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutt, M. L., Desmond, H., Devriendt, J., & Slyz, A. (2022). The effect of local Universe constraints on halo abundance and clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 516(3), 3592–3601. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free