Validación de la encuesta de calidad y satisfacción de simulación clínica en estudiantes de enfermería

31Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

High-fidelity clinical simulations are considered a fundamental method of training for nursery students. One way of assessing the effectiveness of this method is through student’s satisfaction. Objective: To validate the constructs of the Spanish version of the scale presented in “Survey of Quality and Satisfaction of clinical simulation” by Durá Ros. Method: A cross-sectional study was used, with a sample consisting of 216 undergraduate nursing students from third to fifth year from the University of Bío-Bío, in Chillán, Chile. A Principal Components Analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation was used. Internal consistency was evaluated with α-Cronbach. Results: Of the 216 students, 37% were in the third year of the program, 36.6% in the fourth year and 26.4% in the fifth year. Using a grading scale of 1 to 7, 87.5% of students averaged grades between 5.0 and 5.99. A KMO=0.887 coefficient was obtained, and the Bartlett’s sphericity test was statistically significant (χ2=1014,977; 105 gl; p < 0.001). The Principal Components Analysis (PCA) resulted in three components: significant learning, structure of the clinical simulation and interpersonal relationship with the clinical simulation. Together, these components managed to explain 51.227% of the total variance, with α values being 0.865, 0.467 and 0.550 respectively. Conclusion: Three components emerged from the analysis, which help characterize student’s satisfaction regarding clinical simulation. Exploratory work is suggested until a confirmatory factor analysis is reached to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Astudillo Araya, Á., López Espinoza, M. Á., Cádiz Medina, V., Fierro Palma, J., Figueroa Lara, A., & Vilches Parra, N. (2017). Validación de la encuesta de calidad y satisfacción de simulación clínica en estudiantes de enfermería. Ciencia y Enfermeria, 23(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532017000200133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free