Treatment options for women with stress urinary incontinence

32Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

About one-quarter million surgical procedures are performed each year in the United States for stress urinary incontinence. After outlining the presentation and diagnostic evaluation of stress urinary incontinence, this review concentrates specifically on the numerous conservative management strategies and minimally invasive surgical options for women with this common complaint. In the evaluation of nursing home residents with incontinence, the Minimum Data Set and Resident Assessment Protocol facilitate nonspecialist evaluation and management. In healthy adults, the therapeutic implications of the physical examination of the pelvic floor, assessing for the presence and strength of the voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, are detailed as the basis for all conservative management strategies. Reports on the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle reeducation and pelvic floor electrical stimulation vary substantially, as do long-term results of surgical interventions. Surgical management is highly effective in the appropriate candidate. The current theory and practice of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence are outlined, with certain caveats regarding the lack of long-term follow-up for newer less invasive techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lightner, D. J., & Itano, N. M. B. (1999). Treatment options for women with stress urinary incontinence. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4065/74.11.1149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free