Abstract
Contesting European regions. Regional Studies. A regional or ‘meso’-level of regulation and policy-making has emerged in Europe. This cannot adequately be explained by functional imperatives or drivers. A constructivist perspective sees the region as the outcome of political contestation over the definition and meaning of territory. Six competing conceptual frames for regionalism are proposed: integrative; competitive; welfare; identity; government; and the region as a refraction of social and economic interests. Any given case will reflect a balance among these conceptions. Such an understanding permits a combination of comparative analysis with an understanding of individual cases and avoids both dismissal of territory and territorial determinism.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Keating, M. (2017). Contesting European regions. Regional Studies, 51(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.