In-House IgM Dot-Blot Assay for Serodiagnosis of Human Leptospirosis: Development, Standardisation, and Performance Evaluation

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Laboratory confirmation of human leptospirosis relies on serological tests, with the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) as the reference. However, due to its complexity, there is a need for a simpler and more accessible diagnostic method. This study aimed to standardise and develop an IgM dot-blot test with a whole-cell antigen from saprophytic Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc for diagnosing human leptospirosis. After checkerboard titration standardisation, IgM dot-blot was performed with paired serum samples from 124 MAT-confirmed leptospirosis cases and 143 serum samples from healthy and diseased individuals as the control group. Repeatability and reproducibility were also evaluated. An IgM dot-blot kit was then developed and compared to the PanbioTM Leptospira IgM ELISA using 144 serum samples from patients with suspected leptospirosis. The IgM dot-blot showed a sensitivity of 58.1% and 96.0% when performed on acute and convalescent samples, respectively. Specificity was 94.4%. The repeatability and reproducibility of the IgM dot-blot showed 100% consistency. Comparison of IgM dot-blot and IgM ELISA showed almost perfect agreement, with a Kappa index of 0.81. The developed IgM dot-blot offers a robust alternative to existing methods, requiring minimal specialised equipment and fewer reagents than IgM ELISA. The good performance of this IgM dot-blot immunoassay makes it a promising tool for diagnosing human leptospirosis, potentially increasing diagnostic capacity, especially in places with limited resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanco, R. M., dos Santos Lima, E., Pinhata, J. M. W., Brandao, A. P., & Romero, E. C. (2025). In-House IgM Dot-Blot Assay for Serodiagnosis of Human Leptospirosis: Development, Standardisation, and Performance Evaluation. Microorganisms, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free