Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In the staging of endometrial cancer (EC), the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for high-risk EC is still unclear. Methods: Two authors independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion and assessed study quality. English studies published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library before 20th SEP, 2019 were retrieved to perform a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis which evaluate the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of SLN mapping in high-risk EC. Statistical analysis was conducted using stata14.0 software. Results: A total of 12 studies were included, including 758 high-risk EC patients. The detection rate of SLN mapping was 84.8% (95% CI, 79.9–89.6%). The pooled bilateral detection rate was 67.0% (95% CI, 56.8–77.3%). The pooled para-aortic detection rate was 8.4% (95% CI, 1.8–14.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 87% (95% CI, 79–92%), and the pooled specificity was 98% (95% CI, 96–99%). Pooled negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.7% (95% CI, 96.4–99.1%), AUC =0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–0.099). Conclusions: SLN mapping still has a high detection rate and diagnostic accuracy in high-risk EC. SLN mapping is a reliable alternative to systematic lymph node dissection, but its prognostic effect on high-risk EC is yet to be further studied and verified by large sample studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ji, Q., Wang, X., Jiang, J., & Chen, L. (2020). Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gland Surgery, 9(6), 2091–2105. https://doi.org/10.21037/GS-20-807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free