JUDICIAL DECISIONS, BACKLASH AND SECESSIONISM: THE SPANISH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND CATALONIA

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We exploit a unique quasi-experiment to study the effects of judicial decisions on sensitive issues on political attitudes. In 2010, the Spanish Constitutional Court partially overruled the new Catalan Constitution—the Estatut—that granted further decentralisation. Our identification strategy relies on the fact that this ruling occurred amid a public opinion survey. We find that the ruling increased support for independence by 5 percentage points. We interpret this result as evidence of judicial backlash on political attitudes: a judicial decision that limited further autonomy triggered a shift in attitudes towards even more autonomy. Moreover, the ruling decreased trust in the courts and satisfaction with democracy. This backlash of political attitudes extends to other spheres: Catalans increased their national identification with their region and the support for pro-decentralisation parties. Finally, we show that the ruling increased polarisation around the partisan and identity cleavages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casas, A., Curci, F., & De Moragas, A. I. (2024). JUDICIAL DECISIONS, BACKLASH AND SECESSIONISM: THE SPANISH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND CATALONIA. Economic Journal, 134(664), 3202–3231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free