Abstract
At each stage of inquiry, actions, choices, and judgments carry with them a chance that they will lead to mistakes and false conclusions. One of the most vigorously discussed kinds of epistemic risk is inductive risk-that is, the risk of inferring a false positive or a false negative from statistical evidence. This chapter develops a more fine-grained typology of epistemic risks and argues that many of the epistemic risks that have been classified as inductive risks are actually better seen as examples of a more expansive category, which this paper dubs "phronetic risk." This more fine-grained typology helps to show that values in science often operate not exclusively at the level of individual psychologies but also at the level of knowledge-generating social institutions.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Biddle, J. B., & Kukla, R. (2017). The geography of epistemic risk. In Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science (pp. 215–238). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467715.003.0011
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.