Risk approach—Risk hierarchy or construction investment risks in the light of interim empiric primary research conclusions

15Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The focus of this study is to examine the investment project process. Since investment can also be considered as economic interactions, certain risks are associated with their implementation. Risk factors were given a particular priority during the secondary and primary research, while determining the most relevant risk factors of investment project processes in relation to the B2B market. The risk map for investment project processes was created in line with the relevant secondary sources, qualitative and quantitative primary results. This is topical because the importance of investments is unquestionable in a market economy. Therefore, a comprehensive risk assessment might provide results that are useful for both supply and demand side actors in B2B market relations. Based on the results of the primary study, the perceived risks of the project process were defined, and they were structured into a risk hierarchy system. Based on the qualitative results, we performed a quantitative study. Based on the responses of the sample subjects, we determined the perceived risk factors, and on the basis of them, we segmented the service provider (contractor) market. The main socio-demographic characteristics of each segment were also explored in the framework of the research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szemere, T. P., Garai-Fodor, M., & Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. (2021). Risk approach—Risk hierarchy or construction investment risks in the light of interim empiric primary research conclusions. Risks, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free