Clinical comparison of semiconductor diode versus neodymium: YAG non-contact cyclo photocoagulation

40Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims-The advent of diode lasers has allowed their use in transscleral cyclo photocoagulation for refractory glaucoma. A trial was performed to compare the ocular hypotensive and inflammatory effects of cyclo photocoagulation using a continuous wave diode (810 nm) and a free running neodymium:yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (1064 nm). Methods-Forty patients with refractory glaucoma were randomised to receive either diode or Nd:YAG therapy. The intraocular pressure (IOP) and inflammatory response to treatment were monitored over 3 months. Results-There was no significant laser related difference in the effect on IOP after one treatment. There was, however, a difference in effect in retreatments with the IOP lowering effect significantly less, but equally sustained in diode retreatment patients. Severe postoperative complications such as hyphaema or fibrinous anterior uveitis only occurred in the Nd:YAG group. Conclusion-The degree and duration of the ocular hypotensive response to cyclo photocoagulation appears to be related to the available power output of the system used, and the extent of tissue damage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ulbig, M. W., McHugh, D. A., McNaught, A. I., & Hamilton, A. M. P. (1995). Clinical comparison of semiconductor diode versus neodymium: YAG non-contact cyclo photocoagulation. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 79(6), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.6.569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free