Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: Evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic

33Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examined two different accounts of why studying distinctive information reduces false memories within the DRM paradigm. The impoverished relational encoding account predicts that less memorial information, such as overall familiarity, is elicited by the critical lure after distinctive encoding than after nondistinctive encoding. By contrast, the distinctiveness heuristic predicts that participants use a deliberate retrieval strategy to withhold responding to the critical lures. This retrieval strategy refers to a decision rule whereby the absence of memory for expected distinctive information is taken as evidence for an event's nonoccurrence. We show that the typical false-recognition suppression effect only occurs when the recognition test is self paced. This suppression effect is abolished when participants make recognition decisions under time pressure, such as within 1 second of seeing the test item. These results are consistent with the distinctiveness heuristic that a time-consuming retrieval strategy is used to reduce false-recognition responses. Copyright 2005 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dodson, C. S., & Hege, A. C. G. (2005). Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: Evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(4), 726–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196764

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free