Institutional challenges in water reuse and circularity: insights from co-creation processes in Southern Europe and Middle East

11Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The transition to the water circular economy (WCE) requires several stakeholders' awareness, articulation, and action involving complex governance concerns. As a participatory approach to identifying problems, designing solutions, and implementing strategic actions, the co-creation process should support stakeholder involvement to adjust existing institutional arrangements to foster the WCE. This article designs and applies a co-creation process to analyse the perception of key stakeholders about institutional challenges for water reuse and explore their contributions to innovate policy, planning, and governance for the implementation of new water reuse technology in Almendralejo (Spain), Lecce (Italy), Omis (Croatia), and Eilat (Israel). The findings indicate that implementing a new water loop encounters complex institutional and production-related obstacles, which different stakeholders address in varying ways. Moreover, the proposed solutions to the on-site issues identified emphasise the need for actions that foster engagement and collaboration, particularly to enhance awareness, training, and regulation. Addressing these challenges associated with adopting new water loops, even when technical, may depend on non-technical solutions regarding the institutional framework. The co-creation processes highlight the importance of focusing on institutional arrangements and stakeholder awareness while implementing new water loops to ensure and promote symbiotic territories that consider the policy, producers', and users' strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matos, M. V., Fidélis, T., Sousa, M. C., Riazi, F., Miranda, A. C., & Teles, F. (2025). Institutional challenges in water reuse and circularity: insights from co-creation processes in Southern Europe and Middle East. Water Policy, 27(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2025.165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free