Clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the remotely monitored implantable loop recorder Medtronic Reveal LINQ TM

Abstract

Aims Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are indicated in a variety of clinical situations when extended cardiac rhythm monitoring is needed. We aimed to assess the clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the new Medtronic Reveal LINQ TM ILR that can be inserted outside the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory and remotely monitored. Methods and results All 154 consecutive patients (100 males, 63 ± 15 year-old) who received the Reveal LINQ TM ILR during the period July 2014-June 2016 were enrolled. The device was implanted in a procedure room and all patients where provided with the MyCareLink TM remote monitoring system. Data were reviewed every working day via the Carelink® web system by a specialist nurse who, in case of significant events, consulted an electrophysiologist. During a mean follow-up of 12.1 (6.7-18.4) months (range 2-24 months), a diagnosis was made in 99 (64%) patients and in 60 (39%) ≥1 therapeutic interventions were established following recording of arrhythmias. In 26 of these 60 patients, remote monitoring prompted therapeutic interventions following asymptomatic arrhythmic events 3.8 months before the next theoretical scheduled in-office data download. False bradycardia detection for undersensing occurred in 44 (29%) patients and false tachycardia detection for oversensing in 4 (3%). One patient experienced skin erosion requiring explantation and none suffered from infection. Conclusion The remote monitoring feature of the Reveal LINQ TM allowed earlier diagnosis of asymptomatic but serious arrhythmias in a significant proportion of patients. Implantation of the device outside the EP laboratory appeared safe. However, R-wave undersensing and consequent false recognition of bradyarrhythmias remains a clinically important technical issue.