Against evidence-based management, for management learning

83Citations
Citations of this article
330Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Evidence-based management has been widely advocated in management studies. It has great ambition: All manner of organizational problems are held to be amenable to an evidence-based approach. With such ambition, however, has come a certain narrowness that risks restricting our ability to understand the diversity of problems in management studies. Indeed, in the longer term, such narrowness may limit our capacity to engage withmany reallife issues in organizations. Having repeatedly heard the case for evidence-based management, we invite readers to weigh the case against. We also set out an alternative direction - one that promotes intellectual pluralism and flexibility, the value of multiple perspectives, openness, dialogue, and the questioning of basic assumptions. These considerations are the antithesis of an evidence-based approach, but central to a fully rounded management education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morrell, K., & Learmonth, M. (2015). Against evidence-based management, for management learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(4), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free