GRADE pearls and pitfalls—Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

21Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is used to assess the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We describe how the GRADE approach is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including key points and examples. This overview is aimed at clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analyses using GRADE. Results: We outline how the certainty of evidence is assessed, how the evidence is summarized using GRADE evidence profiles or summary of findings tables, how the results are communicated, and we discuss challenges, advantages, and disadvantages with using GRADE. Conclusions: This overview aims to provide an overview of how GRADE is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and may be used by systematic review developers, methodologists, and evidence end-users.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Duhailib, Z., Granholm, A., Alhazzani, W., Oczkowski, S., Belley-Cote, E., & Møller, M. H. (2024, May 1). GRADE pearls and pitfalls—Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14386

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free