Impact of palbociclib plus fulvestrant on patient reported general health status compared with fulvestrant alone in HR +, HER2- metastatic breast cancer

  • Loibl S
  • Demichele A
  • Turner N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The present analyses compares patient reported general health status between palbociclib plus fulvestrant and fulvestrant alone in HR + , HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients in PALOMA -3 study (NCT 01942135; Turner et al. NEJM 2016) were randomized to palbociclib plus fulvestrant (n= 347) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n= 174). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, on day 1 of each cycle until cycle 4 and every alternate cycle from cycle 6 until end of treatment using EQ-5D, a standardized measure of health status that consists of a descriptive system comprising 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression rated at 3 levels (no, some, or extreme problems) and a single index score for health status (range 0 [dead] to 1 [full health]) calculated using a standard algorithm. In addition, a visual analog scale (VAS) measured self-rated health status from '0' (worst imaginable) to '100' (best imaginable). Repeated measures mixed-effects analyses were performed to compare overall index and VAS scores between treatments, controlling for baseline. Results: Completion rates at baseline were ≥85% in each group. The mean (SD) scores at baseline were comparable between palbociclib plus fulvestrant and fulvestrant alone for the VAS (72.9 [17.22] vs 70.3 [19.87]) and the EQ-5D index scores (0.73 [0.23]) vs (0.71 [0.23]). General health status assessed by VAS was found to be maintained from baseline and no significant difference in overall EQ-5D VAS scores was observed between the treatment arms. The proportion of patients reporting the presence of a problem at baseline was similar for palbociclib plus fulvestrant and fulvestrant, respectively: mobility (28% vs 32%), self-care (9% vs 9%), usual activities (38% vs 45%), pain (67% vs 67%), and anxiety/depression (52% vs 61%). The overall mean EQ-5D index scores on treatment was significantly greater (p {\textbackslash}textless 0.05) for palbociclib plus fulvestrant (0.74) compared with fulvestrant alone (0.69). Conclusions: Addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant was associated with significantly higher on treatment EQ-5D index scores compared to fulvestrant alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loibl, S., Demichele, A., Turner, N. M., Cristofanilli, M., Loi, S., Verma, S., … Harbeck, N. (2016). Impact of palbociclib plus fulvestrant on patient reported general health status compared with fulvestrant alone in HR +, HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Annals of Oncology, 27, vi80. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw365.39

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free