Evidence-based veterinary medicine at 20 – a commentary on historical, philosophical, practical, and ethical aspects

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM) has pervaded the veterinary profession in the last two decades, including academic and regulatory arenas, as well as practising veterinarians. Evidence-based veterinary medicine grew from its older human sister, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and in doing so shares EBM’s central tenets of how best to do medicine. However, EBM has by no means been universally accepted; it has attracted fierce criticism and undergone several revisions since inception. In this article, we trace history of both movements and critically examine the philosophical basis of EBM/EBVM being better. We also assess the practicality of EBVM and examine ethical aspects of its use. With knowledge of EBM’s evolution, possible ways forward for EBVM are suggested that attempt to avoid EBM’s historical setbacks and improve individual veterinary patient care under EBVM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mills, D., Reiss, M. J., & Campbell, M. (2025). Evidence-based veterinary medicine at 20 – a commentary on historical, philosophical, practical, and ethical aspects. Veterinary Evidence. Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i3.710

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free