Comparative Review of Selected Internet Communication Protocols

8Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With a large variety of communication methods and protocols, many software architects face the problem of choosing the best way for services to share information. For communication technology to be functional and practical, it should enable developers to define a complete set of CRUD methods for the processed data. The research team compared this paper's most commonly used data transfer protocols and concepts: REST, WebSocket, gRPC GraphQL and SOAP. A set of web servers was implemented in Python, each using one of the examined technologies. Then, the team performed an automated benchmark measuring time and data transfer overhead for a set of defined operations: creating an entity, retrieving a list of 100 entities and fetching details of one entity. Tests were designed to avoid the results being interfered with by database connection or docker-compose environment characteristics. The research team has concluded that gRPC was the most efficient and reliable data transfer method. On the other hand, GraphQL turned out to be the slowest communication method of all. Moreover, its server and client libraries caused the most problems with proper usage in a web server. SOAP did not participate in benchmarking due to limited compatibility with Python and a lack of popularity in modern web solutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamiński, L., Kozłowski, M., Sporysz, D., Wolska, K., Zaniewski, P., & Roszczyk, R. (2023). Comparative Review of Selected Internet Communication Protocols. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 48(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2023-0003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free