Social exchange and solidarity: in-group love or out-group hate?

104Citations
Citations of this article
199Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Men exhibit a stronger tendency to favor the in-group over the out-group compared to women. We examined whether this male-specific "coalitional psychology" represents in-group love or out-group hate. One hundred thirty-three college freshmen played a prisoner's dilemma game with a member of their own group and a member of another group. Both groups consisted of same-sex participants. An in-group bias (cooperation with the in-group at a level higher than cooperation with the out-group) based on expectations of cooperation from the in-group was observed for both men and women. When such expectations were experimentally eliminated, women did not show any in-group bias, whereas men still exhibited an in-group bias. This male-specific in-group bias was found to be a product of intragroup cooperation (in-group love) rather than a product of intergroup competition (out-group hate). These findings suggest that the male-specific coalitional psychology caters more toward the promotion of within-group solidarity than aggression against the out-group. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamagishi, T., & Mifune, N. (2009). Social exchange and solidarity: in-group love or out-group hate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.02.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free