Patient-reported outcomes during telehealth versus in-person follow-up visits for patients treated with extracorporeal shockwave therapy

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The limited research describing clinical outcomes using telehealth for management of musculoskeletal conditions is primarily within orthopedic surgery care. Objective: To characterize differences in patient reported outcomes using telehealth compared with in-person follow-up visits in patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) or plantar fasciitis (PF) treated using extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Outpatient sports medicine clinic. Patients: 82 patients with AT and 46 patients with PF. Interventions: In-person (n = 76) and telehealth (n = 52) follow-up visits. Main Outcome Measurements: Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) for AT and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) for PF as well as billing level. Results: There was significant improvement from baseline to final VISA-A (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vu, K., Rhim, H. C., McCormack, M., Fee, J., Gureck, A., DeLuca, S., … Tenforde, A. S. (2024). Patient-reported outcomes during telehealth versus in-person follow-up visits for patients treated with extracorporeal shockwave therapy. PM and R, 16(4), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free