An indirect approach for reference intervals establishment of immunoglobulin A, G and M: the combination of laboratory database and statistics

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Immunoglobulins are affected by sex, age and region, so it is necessary to establish suitable reference intervals (RIs) for clinical diagnosis. Various statistical methods were used to calculate RIs, but there has been a lack of comparison among the methods. Research based on immunoglobulin RIs establishment with various methods would provide a methodological basis for further research. A total of 16,525 individuals were enrolled in the study. Individuals were selected in the medical examination center of First Hospital of Jilin University from 2014 to 2020. The lambda-mu-sigma (LMS) method was performed to evaluate the dynamic changes in analytes. RIs were calculated by parametric, non-parametric, Hoffman method and Bhattacharya method. Sex and age partitions were found for immunoglobulins G and immunoglobulin M. The levels of IgM showed no difference with age in males, but showed differences after 50 years of age in females. Circulating immunoglobulin A concentrations showed an increasing trend with age, and immunoglobulin M showed a fluctuating trend with age. Obvious difference (>5%) was commonly found among the four methods, however, the RIs established by the four methods all passed the verification with a high passing rate. Sex and age differences should be considered for immunoglobulins G and immunoglobulin M in clinical practice. The feasibility of the four indirect methods was proven, which would provides a methodological reference for further studies and benefit the application of clinical data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chai, J., Sun, Z., Zhang, S., Zhou, Q., & Xu, J. (2022). An indirect approach for reference intervals establishment of immunoglobulin A, G and M: the combination of laboratory database and statistics. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 82(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2022.2092897

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free