The need for theory-based evaluation of care coordination initiatives: Considerations from the 2017 International Conference on Realist Research, Evaluation and Synthesis

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research in the field of care coordination faces the challenge of providing transferable explanatory insights regarding what principles and initiatives work in practice and why. Such insights are crucial in developing effective solutions for global disease burdens. Realist research approaches have demonstrated potential to deliver stronger theoretical contributions of evaluation studies across fields of research. These were discussed at the International Conference for Realist Research, Evaluation and Synthesis in Brisbane (from 24 to 26 October 2017). This paper provides an overview and reflection on the conference by four participants. It focuses on (1) topical debates and challenges for the application of realistic methodology in health services research, as presented at the conference and (2) implied opportunities and challenges for (realist) evaluation of care coordination initiatives. Based on the reflections, future realist evaluation on evaluating complex care coordination initiatives is recommended.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vugts, M., Liu, H., Boumans, J., & Boydell, E. (2018). The need for theory-based evaluation of care coordination initiatives: Considerations from the 2017 International Conference on Realist Research, Evaluation and Synthesis. International Journal of Care Coordination, 21(3), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434518779751

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free