In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nanostructured biphasic calcium phosphate in granules and putty configurations

7Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) granules and powder are biocompatible bio-materials with a well-known capacity for osteoconduction, presenting very satisfactory clinical and histological results. It remains unanswered if the putty configuration impacts the biological response to the material. In this study, we aimed to compare the cytocompatibility and biocompatibility of nanostructured BCP in the putty configuration (moldable nanostructured calcium phosphate, MnCaP) on the healing of critical-sized bone defects (8 mm) in rat calvaria. Cytocompatibility was determined through the viability of fibroblast cells (V-79) to the extracts of different concentrations of MnCaP. Forty-five Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15)—clot, MnCaP, and commercial biphasic calcium phosphate in granules configurations (Nanosynt® )—and subdi-vided into three experimental periods (1, 3, and 6 months). Histological, histomorphometric, and microtomographic analyses allowed the evaluation of newly formed bone, residual biomaterial, and connective tissue. The in vitro evaluation showed that MnCaP was cytocompatible. The histomor-phometric results showed that the Nanosynt® group granted the highest new-formed bone values at six months (p < 0.05), although the biomaterial volume did not differ between groups. The putty configuration was easier to handle, and both configurations were biocompatible and osteoconductive, presented similar biosorption rates, and preserved the calvaria architecture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nascimento, J. R. B., Sartoretto, S. C., Alves, A. T. N. N., Mourão, C. F. A. B., Martinez-Zelaya, V. R., Uzeda, M. J., … Calasans-Maia, J. A. (2021). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nanostructured biphasic calcium phosphate in granules and putty configurations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free