Use of natural-fiber bio-composites in construction versus traditional solutions: Operational and embodied energy assessment

40Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During the last decades natural polymers have become more and more frequent to replace traditional inorganic stabilizers in building materials. The purpose of this research is to establish a comparison between the most conventional building material solutions for load-bearing walls and a type of biomaterial. This comparison will focus on load-bearing walls as used in a widespread type of twentieth century dwelling construction in Europe and still used in developing countries nowadays. To carry out this analysis, the structural and thermal insulation characteristics of different construction solutions are balanced. The tool used for this evaluation is the life cycle assessment throughout the whole lifespan of these buildings. This research aims to examine the environmental performance of each material assessed: Fired clay brick masonry walls (BW), concrete block masonry walls (CW), and stabilized soil block masonry walls (SW) stabilized with natural fibers and alginates. These conventional and new materials are evaluated from the point of view of both operational and embodied energy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galan-Marin, C., Rivera-Gomez, C., & Garcia-Martinez, A. (2016). Use of natural-fiber bio-composites in construction versus traditional solutions: Operational and embodied energy assessment. Materials, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060465

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free