Increasing functional avidity of TCR- Redirected T cells by removing defined N- glycosylation sites in the TCR constant domain

136Citations
Citations of this article
163Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of T lymphocytes transduced with a T cell receptor (TCR) to impart tumor reactivity has been reported as a potential strategy to redirect immune responses to target cancer cells (Schumacher, T.N. 2002. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:512-519). However, the affinity of most TCRs specific for shared tumor antigens that can be isolated is usually low. Thus, strategies to increase the affinity of TCRs or the functional avidity of TCR- transduced T cells might be therapeutically beneficial. Because glycosylation affects the flexibility, movement, and interactions of surface molecules, we tested if selectively removing conserved N-glycoslyation sites in the constant regions of TCR α or β chains could increase the functional avidity of T cells transduced with such modified TCRs. We observed enhanced functional avidity and improved recognition of tumor cells by T cells harboring TCR chains with reduced N-glycosylation (ΔTCR) as compared with T cells with wild-type (WT) TCR chains. T cells transduced with WT or ΔTCR chains bound tetramer equivalently at 4°C, but tetramer binding was enhanced at 37°C, predominantly as a result of reduced tetramer dissociation. This suggested a temperature-dependent mechanism such as TCR movement in the cell surface or structural changes of the TCR allowing improved multimerization. This strategy was effective with mouse and human TCRs specific for different antigens and, thus, should be readily translated to TCRs with any specificity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuball, J., Hauptrock, B., Malina, V., Antunes, E., Voss, R. H., Wolfl, M., … Greenberg, P. D. (2009). Increasing functional avidity of TCR- Redirected T cells by removing defined N- glycosylation sites in the TCR constant domain. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 206(2), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20082487

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free