A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter following elective cesarean section

38Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare immediate and 12 h postoperative removal of urinary catheter after elective cesarean section. Study design: In a prospective clinical trial at a university teaching hospital, 300 eligible women admitted for primary or repeat elective cesarean section were randomized into two equal groups. In group A, the catheter was removed immediately after the procedure; whereas in group B, the catheter was removed 12 h postoperatively. Results: The incidence of postoperative significant bacteruria (p = 0.020), dysuria (p = 0.030), burning on micturition (p = 0.016), urinary frequency (p = 0.031), and urgency (p = 0.011) were significantly lower in group A compared with group B. The mean postoperative ambulation time (p < 0.001), time till the first voiding (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.001) were also significantly shorter in group A. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of urinary retention necessitating recatheterization (p = 0.371). Conclusion: Immediate removal of urinary catheter after elective cesarean section is associated with lower risk of urinary infection and earlier postoperative ambulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El-Mazny, A., El-Sharkawy, M., & Hassan, A. (2014). A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter following elective cesarean section. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 181, 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free