When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation

162Citations
Citations of this article
286Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A recent theory holds that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) uses reinforcement learning signals conveyed by the midbrain dopamine system to facilitate flexible action selection. According to this position, the impact of reward prediction error signals on ACC modulates the amplitude of a component of the event-related brain potential called the error-related negativity (ERN). The theory predicts that ERN amplitude is monotonically related to the expectedness of the event: It is larger for unexpected outcomes than for expected outcomes. However, a recent failure to confirm this prediction has called the theory into question. In the present article, we investigated this discrepancy in three trial-and-error learning experiments. All three experiments provided support for the theory, but the effect sizes were largest when an optimal response strategy could actually be learned. This observation suggests that ACC utilizes dopamine reward prediction error signals for adaptive decision making when the optimal behavior is, in fact, learnable. © 2009 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holroyd, C. B., Krigolson, O. E., Baker, R., Lee, S., & Gibson, J. (2009). When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.59

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free