Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo?

  • Neiva P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article seeks to identify the determinants of the existence and powers of upper legislative chambers. By analyzing their constitutionally established powers, including all of the minimally democratic bicameral countries, it was possible to reach conclusions not previously suggested in the literature. Using a two-step model whose calculation includes the possibility of a selection bias (Heckman model), the study evaluated both the factors leading to the existence of an upper chamber and those defining its powers. Federalism proved to be an important variable for explaining the difference between bicameral and unicameral countries, but not for explaining the political strength of upper chambers. The most relevant explanatory variable in this sense was the system of government: in Parliamentary systems, upper chambers have limited powers; in Presidential systems they exercise broad powers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neiva, P. R. P. (2006). Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? Dados, 49(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0011-52582006000200002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free